I recently engaged
in a dialogue on different learning techniques in my Teaching
Creative Writing course that I felt was worth sharing, partly because it
involves my favorite subject (comics!). I want to talk about this also because of
a concept I feel is that is important for everyone- do we really think about
what medium we read our words in/on, and do we also think about who is
supplying our words? Are these mediums and authors the source of the 'truth' we
all crave, or do they just punctuate it?
Allow me to
explain in a little more detail, one rife with silly images and
nerd-specific lore. Here is a link (and a preview) of a famous panel from
the comic V for Vendetta by Alan Moore. In the comic we see
the following text: [While the dialogue below is a part of the
whole panel, I omitted the start just to show how
the dialogue 'could' feel like it was from any
source, although here I *want* you to know it is from a comic]
Since
mankind's dawn, a handful of oppressors have accepted the responsibility
over our lives that we should have accepted for ourselves. By doing so, they
took our power. By doing nothing, we gave it away. We've seen where their way
leads though camps and wars, towards the slaughterhouse. In anarchy, there is
another way. With anarchy, from rubble comes new life, hope re-instated. They
say anarchy's dead, but see ... reports of my death were ... exaggerated.
With that example having been given there are many things to consider here with the comic in question:
--- Who wrote it? Alan Moore
--- Did Moore have an agenda with the comic? According to his interview + the forward, yes.
--- Does the comic itself express an agenda with politics? Yes, it does.
--- Does the art have a purposeful style meant to accent the Author/Comic's 'Vision/Voice?' Yes
--- Are the opinions expressed above my own based on having read the comic? Yes
Some people will come to certain conclusions about the language/intent of the text based on the medium that they read it in, sometimes with more/less influence given if the author is known or unknown. Given the nature of how (mainly) comics are viewed, many might classify the dialogue above as something worthy only of '
entertainment.' To some the medium defines the content without giving the chance for the content to stand alone. This is not unexpected however, but here is why I am trying to bring it up -
so you can/will consider this when you read something next.
Consider the following - Who is publishing, or who paid to publish, the book or magazine you read. If you get the author's name, Google them. Search them out, find out more! What else have they written? Is their writing consistent in its vision and voice?
So, here is the last part of my little 'post.' Below is a speech from a popular written medium, one especially famous now on the internet. Read the dialogue and DON'T click on the link with the 'reveal' of who the speaker is until you have 'meditated' on the dialogue, etc...
Think about if your opinion changes based on the 'reveal' at the end. It is OKAY if it you find the words of less or more importance afterwards. This is only a small though experiment and I'd love to hear your results!
[ If you already know who is speaking because you recognize the dialogue imagine it from other sources and think on if it is more/less important that way ... ]
"Doesn't matter what the press says. Doesn't matter what the politicians or the mobs say. Doesn't matter if the whole country decides that something wrong is something right.
This nation was founded on one principle above all else: The requirement that we stand up for what we believe, no matter the odds or the consequences. When the mob and the press and the whole world tell you to move, your job is to plant yourself like a tree besides the river of truth, and tell the whole world ---- No. You move."
